State Department spokesman says Washington backs a deal to halt the fighting and free hostages
world9 hours ago
I came across a group of ladies who meet every Thursday afternoon, in the park. All but three of them are French, not Francophone Arabs but Normans, Franks, French.
The women come together as Muslims and then as Westerners who speak French. A few of them wear the khimar (what is known as hijab) and some wear the niqab, but this being UAE, most of them wear the abaya. I ask them how they find each other and they joke about how loudly the French people speak, and how spotting them is therefore easy. “We love French (Muslims) but if we see non-Muslims, we run the other way,” they say. But, why? Because they will have to suffer the usual rude comments about hijab and Islam, all of which any self-respecting, liberal Westerner should never do.
A liberal, Western view is that everything is relative and one who adheres to a humanistic world-view should not be concerned with how a woman dresses. And this is where we find the hypocrisy of the burqa ban.
I’d hope French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s concern for Muslim women would extend to the creation of women-only parks, public pools, education centres and economic develop- ment schemes.
These would, in fact, provide a safe zone for women.
But, Sarkozy is not concerned about women. He and those like him are primarily concerned about their own feelings of inferiority, insecurity and xenophobia, that, perhaps there is some secret within those folds of black.
Phyllis Chesler, feminist writer, pretends not to be so concerned with the ‘political questions around burqa’. She is clearly against it and many things Islamic.
Quoting America’s most vocal Islamophobes, Daniel Pipes, this is painfully apparent: “The sight of women in burqas and niqab is demoralising, frightening, to Westerners of all faiths, including the Muslim faith, as well as to secularists. First, their presence signals the visual subordination of women; the fact that these women acquiesce and collaborate in their own subordination is also alarming, a bit terrifying. One knows that the people who do this also publicly whip, cross- amputate, hang, stone, and be-head human beings. And, if the ‘ghosts’ are here (my own name for burqa wearers) they are meant to remind us of just such practices.” (Daniel) Pipes’s ‘faceless, shapeless’ women are meant to terrify, to disturb. But I wonder, do women who wear the Islamic attire really have this intention? After Sarkozy comes Mona El Tahawy, who is not only a Muslim, but also a former ‘hijab wearer’ who took it off after getting into a debate with a niqab-wearing women on a train. So, does this make her an authority on Islam, women, and Arab issues? No, her only qualification is that she happens to be an Arab, a woman, and a self-proclaimed Muslim.
Yet, as an ‘expert’ she has jumped on Sarkozy’s bandwagon by writing, “I am a Muslim, I am a feminist and I detest the full-body veil, known as a niqab or burqa. It erases women from society and has nothing to do with Islam but everything to do with the hatred for women at the heart of the extremist ideology that preaches it.”
Well, this is quite the opposite of what Chesler was saying — that the burqa is for her terrifying. As far as feminism goes, both women, to me, are agents of Western patriarchy. But the oppression of force and perception of dominance into the affairs of others in a democracy is more oppressive. This notion that the age of liberalism has a never-ending life span is as damaging as it is ridiculous.
Last month, scores of Iranians thought they could Tweet their way to democracy, but who came to their rescue? No one. The fact is, the values of the French Revolution and the French democracy have been lost in the ship that Sarkozy and the ‘feminists’ sailed in. El Tahawy’s blog reveals that the average person has more sense than she does.
“Your position is blatantly hypocritical and completely devoid of substance. How can you call yourself a liberal if you believe in restricting a woman’s right to practice her religion as she sees fit?” says one of the responses. I rest my case.
Maryam Ismail is a Sharjah-based American sociologist and teacher. She can be reached at maryam@journalist.com
State Department spokesman says Washington backs a deal to halt the fighting and free hostages
world9 hours ago
He clarifies that the offer accepted by Hamas is a softened version of Egyptian proposal, which is not acceptable to Israel
mena9 hours ago
These areas will serve a growing population and will act as green corridors that link service areas, residential areas, and workplaces
uae9 hours ago
The Kremlin specifies that the exercises are a response to statements by French President Emmanuel Macron and British officials
world10 hours ago
Hopes for a September cut rose after the non-farm payroll report on Friday
markets10 hours ago
He also stabbed three other workers, leaving them with serious injuries
uae10 hours ago
Dubai FinTech Summit kicked off on Monday with over 200 exhibitors
business10 hours ago
There were no immediate details over what the agreement entailed
mena10 hours ago