Work is underway for packages to serve entire region and alignment of large events and e-service is a vital part of it
gulf1 hour ago
I hope people will listen now," said Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month.
Lagarde was alluding to the wave of reactionary populism that's currently sweeping the developed economies, and was harking back to her speech at Davos in 2013 when she warned that economic "inequality is corrosive to growth; it is corrosive to society".
The IMF has been expressing public concern about inequality since 2010, but this has not translated into concrete action within the IMF's own policies and programmes, according to new research by British political economists, Alex Nunn and Paul White. No references to inequality were added in 2014 when the IMF last reviewed the operational guidelines for its annual macroeconomic surveys, the grading of national economies, which it conducts in consultation with each of its member states (including Australia).
In a sample of 11 countries surveyed since the latest guidelines became effective, Nunn and White found little more than "very passing references" to inequality. Nor has anything significant changed in the requirements that the IMF imposes on countries to which it provides financial assistance. The IMF reviewed the guidelines that shape the conditions on borrowing members in 2011-12 and revisions were introduced in mid-2015. The new "guidance on the guidance" accepts inequality as a concern, but only as secondary and subordinate to its long-established primary concerns with economic growth and fiscal discipline.
Nunn and White's 11-country sample included all seven member states that have struck new borrowing arrangements with the IMF since the guidelines were updated. In every case, the IMF has continued to recommend fiscal discipline, and very few of the policies that could be used for reducing inequality have even been mentioned. Another example of the IMF's hypocrisy on this issue is its stance on research from French political economist Thomas Piketty. The IMF has criticised Piketty's evidence and arguments on making the case for reducing wealth inequality.
A widely-reported IMF working paper, released last August, purported to show that there is "no empirical evidence" to support Piketty's claim that growing inequality results from the return on capital exceeding the economic growth rate. Less widely reported was Piketty's patient response, pointing out that the IMF paper made the embarrassing error of confusing labour incomes with the return on capital, and that the latter was incorrectly estimated in any event.
Together, the IMF's apparent lack of practical action and the sponsoring of this research paper reinforces the suspicion that Lagarde has failed to move "the IMF in the direction of looking at inequality as mainstream and core business", as she boasted in Davos in 2015.
The IMF has long been criticised for tending to create the inequality it now claims to be tackling. Historically, its "structural adjustment programmes" forced many poor countries to scrap welfare policies and pursue privatisations under the so-called "Washington Consensus", exacerbating economic inequalities. This was the subject of a withering critique by Nobel-prizewinning economist Joseph Stiglitz in the wake of the East Asian financial crisis, and has spawned numerous protests around the world.
One reading of the IMF's new high-level rhetoric is that it seeks to distance the institution from this history. It offsets the criticism while allowing the IMF to maintain its adherence to neoliberal policies. This is what Nunn and White refer to as "organised hypocrisy". A somewhat more sympathetic reading of the situation would be that, while the IMF's commitment to managing the systemic risks that inequality presents for global economic stability and growth is real, the institutional barriers to implementation are formidable. Large organisations seeking to make a change of direction are often frustrated by internal struggle and institutional inertia.
The guidelines have been changed so that the IMF is more firmly guided by the economic objectives of its member states, whose social and political policies are supposed to be respected. Perversely, the central global body that many believe exacerbated inequality is now less able to redress the problem.
If tackling the general trend to increased inequality is to be a reality, the main political pressure still needs to be on national governments.
People should listen now, as Christine Lagarde urges - including those who have apparently remained deaf in the IMF.
Christopher Sheil is a Visiting Fellow in History at UNSW. Frank Stilwell is Emeritus Professor, Department of Political Economy, University of Sydney.
-The Conversation
Work is underway for packages to serve entire region and alignment of large events and e-service is a vital part of it
gulf1 hour ago
Starting from May 6 until July 31, the newly formed committee will accept requests at the ISKAN Abu Dhabi Centre
uae2 hours ago
The 61-year-old's symptoms were concerning, especially considering her highly active lifestyle, said doctors
uae2 hours ago
Holiday homes are increasingly gaining traction, witnessing huge growth in occupancy rates as the demand surges
business2 hours ago
In 2023, a trial was conducted to study the sleeping and feeding patterns of the animals
uae attractions2 hours ago
The beachfront resort in Ras Al Khaimah's Al Marjan is being built on an island of almost 62 hectares
uae2 hours ago
With a proficient staff and cutting-edge technology, the hospital ensures accurate and timely test results, minimising any delays in the application process
kt network2 hours ago
Dubai's rental market thrives as the city attracts a growing population of residents, while Metahomes greets home hunters with a user-friendly experience and a vast selection of listings
kt network3 hours ago