Photos from decades ago, video submitted as new evidence to claim credit for inventing the dish
world1 day ago
Twitter Inc is refusing to arbitrate legal claims by hundreds of ex-employees who cannot produce copies of employment contracts they signed, after the company successfully moved to have their class action claims sent to arbitration, according to a court filing.
Shannon Liss-Riordan, a lawyer for more than 1,000 people who were laid off or fired by Twitter last year, said she could be forced to bring hundreds of claims into court just to have Twitter produce copies of the agreements when it moves to send them to arbitration.
Liss-Riordan and Twitter made a joint filing in San Francisco federal court on Thursday to update the court ahead of a hearing scheduled for Feb. 9.
The workers claim Twitter refused to pay promised severance or give them the advance notice of mass layoffs required by law, which the company denies.
A federal judge last month said several of the class action plaintiffs were required to arbitrate their claims. Others did not sign arbitration agreements, so the case has remained in court.
In an interview on Friday, Liss-Riordan said Twitter is likely trying to delay the arbitration cases in hopes that some workers drop their claims.
“This is just a stupid game that Twitter is trying to play,” she said. “No one is giving up.”
Twitter did not respond to a request for comment. In Thursday's filing, the company's lawyers accused Liss-Riordan of attempting to shortcut the arbitration process by not producing all of the agreements.
"It appears obvious that Plaintiffs’ counsel rushed to submit more than 1,000 incomplete and insufficient demands for arbitration for the sole purpose of leveraging large initial case management fees against Twitter," they wrote.
The company also said it was not obligated to give workers any severance and the pay it did give to departing employees "was generous based on Twitter’s financial circumstances."
So-called "mass arbitrations," where hundreds or thousands of people file similar individual claims, can cost companies millions of dollars in fees alone. Plaintiffs' lawyers have increasingly used the tactic to push back against companies that require employees or customers to sign arbitration agreements.
Liss-Riordan has filed three other lawsuits against Twitter stemming from the layoffs, including claims that the company targeted female employees and forced out workers with disabilities. The company has moved to dismiss those claims.
The case is Cornet v. Twitter Inc, US District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:22-cv-06857.
For the plaintiffs: Shannon Liss-Riordan of Lichten & Liss-Riordan.
Photos from decades ago, video submitted as new evidence to claim credit for inventing the dish
world1 day ago
They are accused of offering advice on trading high-risk foreign currency derivatives over the social media platform
world1 day ago
The two days of hearings at the International Court of Justice are part of a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide
world2 days ago
Earlier, leaders condemned Israeli forces' 'barbaric' actions in Gaza but declined to approve punitive economic and political steps against the country
world2 days ago
The Indian prime minister reshared the video on X, saying 'such creativity in peak poll season is truly a delight'
world2 days ago
Move to also bar sex education for children under the age of nine following concerns about some of the materials being used in schools
world2 days ago
Mazzenga claimed another world record in the 90 and over age group this month when she ran the 200 metres outdoors in 51.47 seconds
world2 days ago
Fico was shot five times at close range on Wednesday; suspect is a 71-year-old former security guard at a shopping mall and author of three collections of poetry
world2 days ago