Chemical weapons moved to borders

Syria’s rebels accused strongman Bashar al-Assad on Tuesday of moving chemical weapons to the country’s borders, a day after his beleaguered regime said it would use its stockpiles if attacked.

By (AFP)

  • Follow us on
  • google-news
  • whatsapp
  • telegram

Published: Tue 24 Jul 2012, 7:38 PM

Last updated: Fri 3 Apr 2015, 2:39 PM

Helicopter gunships strafed rebel neighbourhoods of second city Aleppo, as heavy fighting forced the closure of a third of the shopping malls of what is Syria’s commercial capital, pro-government media said.

The rebel Free Syrian Army said the regime’s chemical arsenal had been moved in a bid to pressure the international community, much of which has called for Assad to step aside in the face of the more than 16-month uprising against his rule.

“According to our information, the regime began moving its stocks of weapons of mass destruction several months ago... with the goal of putting pressure on the region and the international community,” a statement said.

At a Damascus news conference on Monday, foreign ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi acknowledged that Syria has chemical weapons and said the regime would use them if attacked by outsiders, although not against its own civilians.

“Syria will not use any chemical or other unconventional weapons against its civilians, and will only use them in case of external aggression,” Makdissi said.

“Any stocks of chemical weapons that may exist, will never, ever be used against the Syrian people,” he said, adding that in the event of foreign attack, “the generals will be deciding when and how we use them.”

US President Barack Obama warned Assad not to make the “tragic mistake” of unleashing chemical weapons.

“Given the regime’s stockpile of chemical weapons, we will continue to make it clear to Assad and those around him that the world is watching,” Obama told an audience of US veterans in the western state of Nevada.

“They will be held accountable by the international community and the United States should they make the tragic mistake of using those weapons,” he added.

Analysts said they doubted whether in the current conflict Assad’s regime would resort to using a chemical weapons stockpile that was developed as a counterbalance to Israel’s presumed nuclear arsenal.

“It’s not at all in the interest of the Syrian army to use these weapons — there is no tactical interest given the nature of the current conflict which is mainly urban,” said Olivier Lepick, specialist in chemical weaponry at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris.

“The regime knows that if it did so it would lose the support of China and Russia.”

As rebel fighters suffered setbacks, notably in Damascus, the opposition Syrian National Council bickered over whether it would accept a transition led temporarily by a member of the regime if Assad steps aside.

An offer to do so by SNC spokesman George Sabra was contradicted just hours later by SNC spokeswoman Bassma Kodmani.

“There was never any question of a national unity government led by a member of the regime,” Kodmani told AFP.

More news from