E-Paper
Sign In
Moral purpose, diplomacy: Why Sheikh Zayed’s negotiation principles matter now more than ever
UAE Founding Father's negotiations were rarely straightforward, and almost never free of difficulty, yet, he consistently worked to reach solutions
- PUBLISHED: Thu 5 Mar 2026, 6:59 PM
As conflict, polarisation and technological disruption reshape global politics, the UAE’s late founding father offers a model of leadership rooted not in force, but in cooperation, moral purpose and diplomacy — principles that, speakers argue, are increasingly rare yet urgently needed today.
Speaking to Khaleej Times, Zaki Nusseibeh, Cultural Adviser to the UAE President, said Sheikh Zayed’s negotiations were rarely straightforward, and almost never free of difficulty. “For Sheikh Zayed every period was a critical period, and every negotiation almost ended in difficulty before there was a solution for it,” Nusseibeh said.
Recommended For You
Those challenges, he explained, began even before the UAE was formed, during negotiations between rulers as they sought to establish the federation. They continued after unification, as emirates held differing views on key issues, and extended to the international stage, where Sheikh Zayed’s efforts to bring parties together often faced early resistance.
Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels.
Yet, Nusseibeh said, Sheikh Zayed consistently worked through those obstacles to reach solutions — guided by firm convictions that cooperation was essential to resolving differences and securing prosperity for people.
“He had deep convictions that we should all work together in order to find resolution to our differences, that we should always try to resolve our issues through diplomatic channels, and that we must always work with a moral purpose and with a humanitarian outlook,” he said.
According to Nusseibeh, those convictions shaped Sheikh Zayed’s approach both internally and externally, enabling negotiations to eventually bear fruit. While he believed strongly in diplomacy, Sheikh Zayed was also firm in defending justice and right causes, setting an example of principled leadership rather than passive compromise.
Lessons for a world of conflict and polarisation
The relevance of that approach was echoed by Dr Anja Merz, Academic Director for Negotiation at Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi, who said Sheikh Zayed’s negotiation model stands in contrast to the increasingly dominant use of power to impose preset solutions.
In a world marked by rising conflict and polarisation, she said, it is essential to demonstrate alternative ways of engaging with differences.
She described Sheikh Zayed’s approach as one that shifts negotiations from a conflict framework — where sides see each other as enemies — to a joint problem-solving mindset, where parties sit “next to each other” and treat challenges as shared.
Dealing with differences, she said, is a skill — one she described as “unconditional constructive behaviour”, rooted in understanding, communication and cooperation rather than force.
Asked how Sheikh Zayed’s leadership principles could be applied by today’s executives and policymakers navigating high-stakes, fast-moving crises, Merz highlighted the importance of balance. Her advice was to be confident yet humble. Confidence, she explained, comes from preparation, experience and being grounded in clear principles. Humility, however, requires recognising that one does not have all the answers, remaining curious, and staying open to other perspectives — even in difficult situations.
Another core lesson, lies in being firm on needs and concerns while remaining flexible on solutions. Rather than entering negotiations with a fixed outcome, Sheikh Zayed focused on understanding both his own interests, such as unity, security and prosperity, and those of others, allowing solutions to emerge through consultation over time.
Caring, she added, was also central to building trust. “When the other side feels that you are caring, it’s a very good start for building trust,” she said, describing Sheikh Zayed as someone who consistently went beyond his own perspective to understand others.
Rooted values in a rapidly changing age
For Nusseibeh, those lessons are not only relevant internationally but urgently needed by younger generations facing what he described as new existential challenges. The rapid spread of artificial intelligence, combined with the influence of social media, he warned, risks stifling critical thinking and distorting public discourse. “Our most important function today as educators is to make sure that our young students, our children, grow the adequate mental critical thinking tools in order to work with these new technologies.”
Technology, he said, should assist human thinking — not replace it. Equally important, he added, is ensuring young people remain rooted in culture, tradition and moral values. Without that moral compass, he warned, they risk becoming lost in what he described as the maze of rapidly expanding technology.
A legacy of cooperation
Many of these themes were explored during a Ramadan session at Majlis Mohamed bin Zayed, which examined lessons on cooperation drawn from Sheikh Zayed’s legacy. During the session, Sheikh Zayed’s approach to cooperation was illustrated through a series of concrete episodes from his leadership, beginning with his early years in Al Ain in the late 1940s.
At the time, the oasis was far from the green, thriving city it is today. Water was scarce, the financial system was broken, and access to water was deeply unequal: large landowners controlled most water rights, while smaller farmers struggled. Rather than imposing a solution, Sheikh Zayed led by example, first giving up his own water rights before asking others to do the same. He then pursued what Merz described as a “package” or multi-issue approach — repairing the old falaj system, building a new one to increase overall water supply, and linking access to that new system to concessions from those who still held exclusive rights. The result was a holistic, patient solution that balanced fairness, sustainability and long-term wellbeing, with Al Ain eventually becoming one of the region’s greenest oases.
Merz went on to describe how similar principles guided Sheikh Zayed once he held greater power as ruler of Abu Dhabi. Despite having the authority to act unilaterally, he was careful not to rely on power for short-term gain. Rather than nationalising oil companies, he chose to form long-term partnerships, recognising that while Abu Dhabi had resources, it lacked the infrastructure, technology and expertise needed to extract them. The same logic shaped the delicate negotiations around unification following the British withdrawal announcement in 1968. At the Al Samha meeting, Sheikh Zayed first approached Dubai - the most influential of the neighbouring emirates, in what Merz described as a deliberate sequencing strategy.
By declaring unity between Abu Dhabi and Dubai as a done deal, while keeping exit barriers low for others, he created both reassurance and flexibility, encouraging wider participation. This incremental, non-coercive approach was also reflected in the provisional constitution, which remained deliberately flexible for years, allowing autonomy to be respected while unity gradually took root.
As Nusseibeh reflected, Sheikh Zayed’s leadership was ultimately anchored not in personal relationships alone, but in shared interests, moral values and a belief that cooperation remains the surest path to peace and progress.
