that considers itself to be spearheading democracy around the world. But the United States has both domestically and in foreign policy, denied much of its own democratic tradition in its “global war on terror.”
Now India must resist the temptation to do the same.
The authorities in New Delhi would be well advised to take the time necessary and assess the situation and its potential consequences thoroughly before taking any action they may later regret. As nearly everyone knows, a conflict between India and Pakistan — both countries armed with nuclear weapons — would bring nuclear mayhem to the subcontinent and beyond. The urge for vengeance by an enraged public demanding action from their officials is understandable, and pushes New Delhi to feel it needs to act. But Delhi’s leadership must avoid a path leading to such a precipice in Indo-Pakistan relations.
The attacks on Mumbai by gunmen belonging to a radical Islamist organisation, in which nearly 200 people were killed and several hundreds wounded, some severely, in the words of one Indian official, was described as “India’s September 11.”
The similarities between the two raids are numerous. Both the attacks on New York City in 2001, and the raids on Mumbai last week targeted financial hubs.
By hitting large business centres, as they did, whoever is behind the Mumbai attacks wanted to do more than kill as many people as they could, before eventually being gunned down by security forces. The attackers were aiming to cause greater harm than the killing of some 200 people and the destruction of hotels and restaurants. (Or in the 9/11 case, the deaths of 3,000 people and several buildings.)
Granted, the senseless killings in Mumbai, as in New York and the Pentagon were, in the sick minds of those committing those terrible acts, an added “benefit.” But to them, the killing of innocent victims was simply that, merely an added benefit. In this analyst’s opinion the real intent of those two raids were far more nefarious.
The real intent is to cause disruption of the countries’ economies. In New York, the attacks had a direct effect on Wall Street and, subsequently, on the country’s economic situation. Likewise, Mumbai’s stock market will be affected by last week’s attacks, as will India’s economy.
Furthermore, both operations were at the same time ingenious from the terrorist’s point of view. They were relatively simple to implement, particularly in open and democratic societies like India and the United States. And the result will be additional security around hotels.
The central lesson of the 9/11 attacks was the ability terrorists had to hijack civilian aircraft and turn them into lethal weapons. The attacks of 9/11 forever changed the way airlines and airport conduct business and the way we look at travel today. Costs for increasing security for airports, airplanes and passengers is passed down to the traveller.
Along similar lines, the attacks in Mumbai last week will forever change the way hotels — particularly luxury ones — conduct their business. The challenge facing intelligence services worldwide now is to try and identify and pre-empt the next likely targets.
Barely 48 hours after the attacks, India began using strong-worded language, saying that Pakistan was behind the Mumbai attacks. According to Indian security services, the surviving terrorist in custody admitted to being Pakistani and having been trained in Pakistan. Indian authorities also found a cellphone of one of the terrorists showing several calls made to Pakistan and Afghanistan.
What of the consequences if India follows the US example? What if India is dragged into the vicious cycle of attacks and counterattacks — verbal, at first — but which could lead to hostile acts and to full-scale war. This is a frightening scenario since both Pakistan and India are nuclear-armed.
Besides the apparent danger that the two countries reach a point of no return, India risks falling into the same trap the United States found itself in after 9/11. The mistakes of the Bush administration were those of enacting undemocratic laws (the USA Patriot Act), and ordering law-breaking government practices (torture, detention, and rendition).
For India to go that route would be self-destructive in the extreme. Anti-Muslim sentiments in India can easily spin out of control. There is bound to be a growing desire in Delhi to retaliate, but this is a time for restraint. India, one of the rare democracies in that part of the world, risks alienating its 154 million Muslims. Even if the attacks on Mumbai may be compared to those of 9/11, it is paramount that the aftermath not follow suit.
Claude Salhani is editor of the Middle East Times and a political analyst in Washington
The system is in line with the country’s climate adaptation programme with a people-centred approach
Global aviation passengers numbers to exceed pre-pandemic levels next year
Country's PMI reaches 57 in November