• Home
• /
• Opinion
• /
• Op-Ed

Europe, China's breakthrough pact may spur global economy

London - Muslim populations in the Middle East and South and Central Asia have repeatedly suffered from brutal wars waged by Western powers, unilateral US sanctions

Kudos to the European Commission (EU) for finalising a new investment agreement with China.

Europe’s active diplomacy also played a role in China’s recent commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 – a decision that was quickly followed by Japan’s pledge to decarbonise by 2050.

Now, it has yielded yet another major success.

The new EU-China investment agreement will benefit Europe, China, the world, and even the United States (US), despite the latter’s warnings against it.

The agreement signifies the intention of the EU and China to continue to deepen economic relations, by granting each party more assured access for investments in the other’s economy.

European industry will gain better access to China’s enormous domestic market just as China embarks on a decade of green and digital economic restructuring, and at a time when Europe is striving to stay at the technological forefront in these areas. The agreement comes in the face of deeply misguided – indeed, dangerous – attempts by US President Donald Trump’s administration not only to cut economic ties with China in high-tech industries, but also to contain China’s growth by forging a US-led alliance that Trump hoped would be backed by the EU and Asia-Pacific countries, including Australia, India, Japan, and South Korea.

It appears that the incoming Biden administration may well lean in the same direction.

The ostensible aim of US policy is to constrain China’s belligerence and human-rights violations, or so the US says. But it is worth noting that the policy is favoured by a bipartisan US foreign-policy establishment that maintains some 800 overseas military bases, and that has repeatedly launched illegal wars, imposed illegal unilateral sanctions, and otherwise refused to abide by the United Nations Charter, treaties, and Security Council decisions. It’s certainly hard to argue that China is the belligerent party here.

But let’s be clear: the US, Europe, India, and many Western nations should make similar improvements.

Over the past 20 years, in particular, Muslim populations in the Middle East and South and Central Asia have repeatedly suffered from brutal wars waged by Western powers and unilateral US sanctions.

Few countries properly abide by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and the US still has not even ratified the UN Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, while China and the EU’s 27-member states did so long ago. The correct response to genuine human-rights concerns is to raise them in a serious and constructive manner, without hypocritical finger-pointing, exaggeration, or disruptions to dialogue, diplomacy, and economic relations.

Let the country without sin cast the first stone.

But America’s real intention in opposing China has nothing to do with human rights. Particularly under Trump’s lawless administration, US policies have been motivated by a hunger for dominance, plain and simple. The US is trying to stop China’s technological and economic rise in order to preserve its own predominance. The world economic system, however, cannot and should not operate for the benefit of US hegemony, especially considering that the US accounts for only 4% of the global population. Following the tragedies of 2020, the world needs renewed global cooperation, not a new US-stoked cold war.

It is time to get the pandemic under control and to chart a new course toward recovery and sustainable development. China can and should be involved as a full partner in tackling these challenges.

After all, China, unlike the US and Europe, successfully suppressed its novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19) epidemic in 2020 (as did most of its neighbours in the Asia-Pacific region).

Now, China and its neighbours should help the rest of the world to implement the non-pharmaceutical interventions (testing, contact tracing, and quarantining) that have succeeded where the US and European policies have failed. And provided that the new Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines are proven safe and effective with peer-reviewed data, China should start mass-producing and distributing these vaccines worldwide.

The EU, China, and US President-elect Joe Biden’s administration should also join forces to map out a green and digital global recovery.

With leading emitters now pursuing carbon neutrality, and with Biden planning to return the US to the Paris climate agreement and to commit the US to decarbonisation by 2050, we have the makings for a truly green broad-based recovery.

Moreover, development and deployment of new green technologies – renewable energy, electric vehicles (EV), and battery storage – will benefit immensely from global cooperation.

Europe is right to engage actively, deeply, and constructively with China, while also attending to its abiding and admirable concerns about human rights around the world. Biden’s administration should resist the hegemonic impulse and instead restart constructive relations with China.

For now, the new EU-China investment agreement is a good way to end a dismal year.

Jeffrey D. Sachs, the Professor of Sustainable Development and Professor of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University, is Director of Columbia’s Center for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network — Project Syndicate