Gulf financial institutions are well capitalized

Top Stories

Gulf financial institutions are well capitalized

In most cases, the legacy of the debt boom will be unpleasant, as households and corporations will enter a period of deleveraging which will hold economic growth lower until their balance sheets are restored.

By Jordi Rof

  • Follow us on
  • google-news
  • whatsapp
  • telegram

Published: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 9:31 AM

Last updated: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 11:34 AM

Credit cycles have been proven to be behind many economic booms and busts. The basic notion is that in periods of intense borrowing, economic growth will accelerate. However, without sufficient productivity improvements, debt will accumulate and debt-fuelled growth will come to an end.
In most cases, the legacy of the debt boom will be unpleasant, as households and corporations will enter a period of deleveraging which will hold economic growth lower until their balance sheets are restored.
Prudential regulation came under close scrutiny after the bust of the last financial crisis. However, the health of the financial system should be permanently checked in order to prevent the accumulation of imbalances that would ultimately lead to an economic downturn.
Solvency, one of the most followed parameters in banking, refers to the capacity of meeting long-term obligations. An economy with solvent banks is less likely to suffer a financial crisis.
Capital ratios, deposit ratios and distribution of liability's maturities are among the main solvency measures.
GCC financial institutions are well capitalised by international standards. Saudi Arabia led the capital-to-assets ratio (CTA) in the GCC in 2014, at 13.7 per cent. Kuwait had the lowest CTA of the GCC, at 11.3 per cent, but was still resilient compared to the OECD average of 7.3 per cent, dragged by European banks.
Non-equity liabilities are also an important solvency determinant. According to Moody's, GCC banks enjoy a wide deposit base, ranging between 60 per cent and 90 per cent of total liabilities, allowing a lower dependency on interbank markets and improving their stability and profitability. These factors are the main reasons behind the high credit ratings of GCC banks awarded by agencies such as Moody's and Fitch.
Asset quality is also crucial in banking. Indicators such as the non-performing loans ratio (NPL) are a good quality gauge, and GCC countries are well positioned by international standards.
OECD's NPL ratio stood at 3.5 per cent of total assets. All GCC countries registered lower values, with the exception of the UAE and Bahrain, with NPL ratios of 6.5 per cent and 4.6 per cent respectively.
A coherent distribution of assets across economic sectors is also crucial in order to diversify risk.
In most GCC countries, we observe that lending to the real estate sector lies between 10 per cent and 20 per cent of total credit, prudent values when compared with the US' 33 per cent. However, there are cases of imbalances.
In Bahrain and Oman, credit to consumers is relatively high at around 40 per cent, and in the case of Qatar, lending to the government is relatively large, accounting for 32 per cent of outstanding loans.
In terms of total assets, the UAE and Bahrain also register a high exposure to the public sector, with 14 per cent and 13 per cent of total assets respectively.
Overall, banks in the GCC appear to be properly capitalised and have their loan portfolios relatively well diversified. However, the link between government and banks is strong, on both the asset side and the deposit side. For instance, government related-deposits account for between 10 per cent and 35 per cent of non-equity resources.
Given the GCC's strong dependence on oil and government spending, a hypothetical downturn could affect bank lending across the board, hurting profitability, and ultimately solvency.
In the current period of low oil prices, the willingness of GCC countries to maintain government spending by reducing surpluses or running deficits will act as a buffer for the banking sector, but the opportunity to diversify further and shield banks as much as possible should not be missed.
The writer is economist at Asiya Investments Company. Views expressed by him are his own and do not reflect the newspaper's policy.
 


More news from