E-Paper
Sign In
Conflict puts $50b Gulf-India remittance lifeline at risk
Nearly 38% of India’s remittance inflows originate from the GCC economies, making this corridor particularly sensitive to any escalation in conflict
- PUBLISHED: Sun 22 Mar 2026, 8:47 PM UPDATED: Sun 22 Mar 2026, 10:52 PM
A prolonged Middle East conflict is raising concerns over global remittance stability, with India — the world’s largest recipient of overseas transfers — facing potential disruption to as much as $50–55 billion in annual inflows from Gulf economies, a corridor that supports millions of households and plays a critical role in maintaining the country’s external balance.
India received a record $135–138 billion in remittances in FY2024–25, consolidating its position as the world’s top destination for diaspora transfers by a wide margin. Globally, remittance flows to developing economies remain one of the most stable sources of external finance, reaching roughly $685 billion in 2024 and continuing to expand into 2025 despite geopolitical volatility.
Recommended For You
Nearly 38 per cent of India’s remittance inflows originate from GCC economies, making the corridor particularly sensitive to any escalation in conflict involving Iran and disruptions to regional trade routes.
With an estimated 9–10 million Indian workers in the Middle East — many employed in construction, logistics, hospitality, retail and domestic services — even moderate disruptions to labour demand could weaken remittance flows over time.
Banking sector analysts say transfers have so far remained broadly stable, reflecting the resilience of migrant earnings and strong financial connectivity between India and Gulf economies. However, the risk lies in a prolonged slowdown in infrastructure spending, tourism activity and cross-border trade across the region.
Remittances remain a key macroeconomic stabiliser for India. Overseas transfers financed roughly 42 per cent of the country’s merchandise trade deficit over the past decade, helping cushion the impact of rising oil import costs and external volatility.
The UAE alone contributes about 19.2 per cent of India’s total remittance inflows, followed by Saudi Arabia at 6.7 per cent, underscoring the Gulf’s strategic importance despite India’s growing diversification toward advanced economies such as the US and the UK.
Within India, exposure to Gulf remittances varies sharply across states, with Maharashtra and Kerala emerging as the two largest beneficiaries.
Maharashtra accounts for about 20.5 per cent of India’s total remittances, equivalent to roughly $27–28 billion annually, supporting consumption demand, housing investment and service-sector expansion in major urban centres such as Mumbai and Pune. Remittance-linked capital flows also play an important role in sustaining small businesses and informal sector activity across the state.
Kerala follows closely with about 19.7 per cent, or nearly $26–27 billion, making overseas transfers one of the single largest contributors to household income, liquidity cycles and real estate activity in the state. Nearly 80 per cent of Kerala’s expatriate workforce is based in the Middle East, making the state particularly vulnerable to labour-market disruptions in the region.
Industry observers say sectors employing large numbers of migrant workers from Kerala — including logistics, hospitality, healthcare support services and transport — are especially sensitive to shifts in regional economic activity. Even temporary reductions in employment or earnings could quickly affect consumption and investment patterns at the state level.
Beyond India, several Asian economies face similar exposure to Middle East remittance corridors.
The Philippines received about $35–36 billion in remittances in 2025, while Pakistan recorded roughly $27 billion annually and Bangladesh more than $40 billion, reflecting strong labour migration links with Gulf labour markets. In these economies, remittances account for a significantly larger share of national income than in India, making them particularly vulnerable to external shocks linked to oil-dependent Middle East economies.
Economists say a prolonged slowdown in Gulf construction activity or tourism could widen current account deficits across South Asia, especially at a time when energy import bills are already rising due to regional tensions.
At the same time, historical experience suggests remittance flows often remain resilient during geopolitical crises — and can even rise temporarily as migrants accelerate precautionary transfers to families back home.
Another structural buffer for India is the diversification of remittance sources. The US now accounts for about 27.7 per cent of inflows, overtaking individual Gulf economies as the single largest source corridor, while the UK, Singapore, Canada and Australia together contribute a growing share.
As the Middle East remains the most important region for blue-collar remittance income, any sustained disruption to Gulf labour markets could ripple quickly through household consumption, regional economies such as Maharashtra and Kerala, and India’s external balance.
While transfer corridors remain stable for now, analysts warn that if the conflict deepens or begins to affect infrastructure investment cycles across the Gulf, one of the most critical financial lifelines linking South Asia to the Middle East could come under sustained pressure at a time of heightened global uncertainty.
