Wknd. KTBuzzon Inspired Living Indulge City Times KT Mobile KT ePaper KT Competitions Subscribe KT
Khaleej Times
Khaleej Times Google Plus Page Khaleej Times Facebook Page Khaleej Times Twitter Page Khaleej Times on Instagram
   
  UAE Sports
  Cricket
  Football
  Horse Racing
  Tennis
  Sports Talk
   
   
  wknd.
  Indulge
  Inspired Living
  Parent Talk
   
   
  Classifieds
  Properties
  Used Cars
   
Home > International
 
Obama defense pick faces Senate fight

(AP) / 8 January 2013

President Barack Obama’s choice to head the Defense Department faces a fight in the Senate as some Republicans quickly announced their opposition to a former colleague.

Also several skeptical Democrats reserved judgment until the nominee explains his views on Israel and Iran.

The concerns about former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel complicate his path to Senate confirmation as the White House pushes for the first Vietnam War veteran to oversee a military emerging from two wars and facing deep budget cuts.

Obama also chose White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan to head the CIA. Brennan is a 25-year veteran of the intelligence agency who is deeply involved with the drone program that is highly unpopular overseas. He is expected to be hit with questions about harsh interrogation techniques used during the George W. Bush administration, as well as administration leaks of secret information. Protesters gathered in front of the White House on Monday, angry over Brennan’s background.

Politically, however, it would be remarkable for the Democratic-controlled Senate to deny Obama his nominee and undercut the president at the start of his second term and in the midst of fierce budget negotiations with Republicans.

Moments after Obama announced his selection of Hagel and called him “the leader that our troops deserve,” some Senate Republicans expressed opposition.

“Given Chuck Hagel’s statements and actions on a nuclear Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah, I think his confirmation would send exactly the wrong message to our allies and enemies alike,” Republican Sen. David Vitter said in a statement. “Israel, our strongest ally in the region, is dealing with a lot of threat and uncertainty right now; Hagel would make that even worse.”

Hagel has upset some Israel supporters with a comment about the “Jewish lobby,” his votes against unilateral sanctions against Iran while backing international penalties on the regime in Tehran and his criticism of talk of a military strike by either the U.S. or Israel against Iran.

He also upset gay rights groups over past comments, including his opposition in 1998 to President Bill Clinton’s choice of James Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg. He referred to Hormel as “openly, aggressively gay.” Hagel recently apologized, saying his comments were “insensitive.”

The Log Cabin Republicans, a gay rights group, took out a full-page ad in The Washington Post highlighting their opposition to Hagel.

In an interview with the Lincoln (Nebraska) Journal Star, Hagel said his statements have been distorted and there is “not one shred of evidence that I’m anti-Israeli, not one (Senate) vote that matters that hurt Israel.”

In a critical sign of support for Hagel’s prospects, the 66-year-old attracted praise from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who heads the Intelligence panel.

Levin called Hagel “well-qualified.” Feinstein described him as “a knowledgeable and independent voice with a strong grasp of the pressing national security issues facing our country.” Reid said “few nominees have such a combination of strategic and personal knowledge of our national defense needs.”

Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy said Hagel “is a combat veteran who still carries shrapnel in his body from his wounds. He will not need on-the-job training.”

While some opposition was expected, no senator has threatened to block the selection. Republican and Democratic congressional aides said the White House wouldn’t have put forth the nomination if it didn’t think it had the votes for Hagel’s confirmation. Democrats hold a 55-45 advantage in the Senate.

Former Sen. Max Cleland, himself a wounded Vietnam veteran, said he thinks Hagel “has to clarify” his positions on issues like Iran and Israel.

But Cleland also said in an interview Tuesday on CBS that Hagel is battle-tested and ready for the challenges of a confirmation process, accusing the critics of “swatting at nothing, shadow-boxing.”

The Senate has rejected one of its own in recent years.

In 1989, the Democratic-led Senate voted down the nomination of John Tower to serve as defense secretary over questions about the former Republican senator’s personal life. It was an embarrassment to President George H.W. Bush, who then turned to Dick Cheney to lead the Pentagon.

While the Armed Services Committee decides Hagel’s fate, the Senate Intelligence panel will decide on Brennan, 57, a close Obama adviser for the past four years.

Brennan withdrew from consideration for the spy agency’s top job in 2008 amid questions about his connection to harsh interrogation techniques used during the George W. Bush administration. He is certain to face questions about the issue again from Democrats while Republicans press him on leaks of classified information in the Obama administration.

In announcing the nominations in the East Room, Obama urged the Senate to move quickly.

“When it comes to national security, we don’t like to leave a lot of gaps between the time that one set of leaders transitions out and another transitions in,” the president said.

 

 

 

For more news from Khaleej Times, follow us on Facebook at facebook.com/khaleejtimes, and on Twitter at @khaleejtimes

Comments
comments powered by Disqus